Açıköğretim Ders Notları

Publıc Internatıonal Law 1 Dersi 2. Ünite Sorularla Öğrenelim

Açıköğretim ders notları öğrenciler tarafından ders çalışma esnasında hazırlanmakta olup diğer ders çalışacak öğrenciler için paylaşılmaktadır. Sizlerde hazırladığınız ders notlarını paylaşmak istiyorsanız bizlere iletebilirsiniz.

Açıköğretim derslerinden Publıc Internatıonal Law 1 Dersi 2. Ünite Sorularla Öğrenelim için hazırlanan  ders çalışma dokümanına (ders özeti / sorularla öğrenelim) aşağıdan erişebilirsiniz. AÖF Ders Notları ile sınavlara çok daha etkili bir şekilde çalışabilirsiniz. Sınavlarınızda başarılar dileriz.

Sources Of International Law

1. Soru

What are the sources of international law?

Cevap

  • international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting States;

  • international custom, as evidence of a gen- eral practice accepted as law;

  • the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;

  • subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the vari- ous nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.


2. Soru

What is the hierarchy of sources of international law?

Cevap

The ICJ will resort to the following sources for deciding a dispute before it: treaties (conventions); custom; general principles of law; judicial decisions; juristic work on international law (the teachings of publicists); principles of equity and ex aequo et bono; General Assembly and Security Council resolutions and practices.


3. Soru

What does ex aequo et bono mean?

Cevap

Ex aequo et bono means what is just and fair or according to equity and good conscience. Something to be decided ex aequo et bono is something that is to be decided by principles of what is fair and just. A decision-maker who is authorized to decide ex aequo et bono is not bound by legal rules but may take account of what is just and fair.


4. Soru

What are the main sources of international law?

Cevap

Treaties, custom, and general principles of law are the main sources of international law.


5. Soru

What are the subsidiary sources of international law?

Cevap

Judicial decisions and juristic work on international law fall into the category ofsubsidiary sources.


6. Soru

What are the requirements for a custom to be accepted as law?

Cevap

There are two requirements for a custom to be accepted as law: (i) there should be sufficiently uniform general practice accepted as law, and (ii) the belief that such a practice is obligatory.


7. Soru

How is state practice categorized?

Cevap

State practice can be categorized into three groups as evidenced: (a) in the mutual relations among States, (b) in the practice of international organizations, and (c) the unilateral practices of States.


8. Soru

What are the main reasons for the decline in the importance of customary law?

Cevap

  • the fact that there are about 200 states and that crating a new custom is  slow process
  • the question of whether a usage has crystallized into a custom is riddled with many difficulties
  • the fact that customary law is an unsuitable vehicle to manage and respond to new scientific challenges

9. Soru

What are the factors that make a treaty general or particular?

Cevap

A convention (treaty) may be general either because of the number of parties (as being accepted by a large number of States), or because of the nature of its contents (which is of universal importance). It may be particular because of the limited number of parties, or because of the limited character of its subject-matter.


10. Soru

What is a treaty contract?

Cevap

A treaty contract is an agreement between two (or only limited number of ) States on a special matter concerning those States exclusively. Such treaties create obligations for the parties that would not have existed under the general international law or they modify the existing rules as applicable to their mutual relations.


11. Soru

What is a soft law?

Cevap

Guidelines of behavior such as those provided by treaties not yet in force, resolutions of the United Nations, or international conferences, that are not binding in themselves but are more than mere statements of political aspiration (they fall into a legal/political limbo between these two states).


12. Soru

What is a custom within the context of international law?

Cevap

Custom is a habitual course of conduct or general practice accepted as law. Custom evolves after a long historical process culminating in its recognition by the community.


13. Soru

When can a custom be treated as a source of law?

Cevap

Custom may be treated as a source of law if it manifests the attributes of antiquity, certainty, continuity, consistency, and uniformity.


14. Soru

How can we distinguish between the terms custom and usage?

Cevap

Usages are habits, often repeated but conflicting. They also vary from one State to another. On the other hand, custom is self-consistent and unified. Usage represents the twilight stage of custom. Custom begins where usage ends. However, it is not necessary that a usage should precede a custom or that a usage becomes a custom. Similarly, there is no international rule that determines when usage shall culminate into a custom.


15. Soru

What are the factors that make a practice or usage a customary rule of international law?

Cevap

For a practice or usage to become a customary rule of international law, the following two factors are essential:

  • A material fact: in similar circumstances States act similarly, in other words, usage has been constantly and uniformly practiced by States.
  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.


16. Soru

What does state practice include?

Cevap

State practice may include treaties, diplomatic correspondence and relations, opinions of national legal advisers, national legislation, policy statements, press releases, official manuals on legal questions, executive decisions and practices, decisions of international and national courts, and the practices of international organizations.


17. Soru

Why is the importance of treaties said to be self-evident?

Cevap

The importance of treaties is self-evident, because under Article 38(l)(a) of the Statute of the ICJ ‘conventions’ have been mentioned as the first recourse which the Court is directed to resort for settling a dispute between the parties.


18. Soru

What is meant by Opinio Jurris Sive Necessitatis?

Cevap

The State practice, even though general and consistent, is not customary law unless an opinio juris or “psychological element” is present, i.e., the practice is recognized as obligatory and there is the conviction that its repetition is the result of a compulsory rule.


19. Soru

When does a treaty bind the non-parties?

Cevap

A treaty will bind the non-parties if they (expressly or by their conduct) manifest their intention to be bound by the provisions of the treaty as general rules of international law.


20. Soru

What is meant by non-liquet in international law?

Cevap

Non-liquet means “it is not clear.” In law, a non liquet is a situation where there is no applicable law. It refers to a situation in which a competent court or tribunal fails to decide the merits of a case for the absence of suitable law, the vagueness or ambiguity of rules, inconsistencies in law, or the injustice of the legal consequences.


1. Soru

What are the sources of international law?

Cevap

  • international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting States;

  • international custom, as evidence of a gen- eral practice accepted as law;

  • the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;

  • subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the vari- ous nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.

  • international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting States;

  • international custom, as evidence of a gen- eral practice accepted as law;

  • the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;

  • subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the vari- ous nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.

  • international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting States;

  • international custom, as evidence of a gen- eral practice accepted as law;

  • the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;

  • subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the vari- ous nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.

  • international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting States;

  • international custom, as evidence of a gen- eral practice accepted as law;

  • the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;

  • subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the vari- ous nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.

  • international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting States;

  • international custom, as evidence of a gen- eral practice accepted as law;

  • the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;

  • subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the vari- ous nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.

2. Soru

What is the hierarchy of sources of international law?

Cevap

The ICJ will resort to the following sources for deciding a dispute before it: treaties (conventions); custom; general principles of law; judicial decisions; juristic work on international law (the teachings of publicists); principles of equity and ex aequo et bono; General Assembly and Security Council resolutions and practices.

The ICJ will resort to the following sources for deciding a dispute before it: treaties (conventions); custom; general principles of law; judicial decisions; juristic work on international law (the teachings of publicists); principles of equity and ex aequo et bono; General Assembly and Security Council resolutions and practices.

The ICJ will resort to the following sources for deciding a dispute before it: treaties (conventions); custom; general principles of law; judicial decisions; juristic work on international law (the teachings of publicists); principles of equity and ex aequo et bono; General Assembly and Security Council resolutions and practices.

The ICJ will resort to the following sources for deciding a dispute before it: treaties (conventions); custom; general principles of law; judicial decisions; juristic work on international law (the teachings of publicists); principles of equity and ex aequo et bono; General Assembly and Security Council resolutions and practices.

The ICJ will resort to the following sources for deciding a dispute before it: treaties (conventions); custom; general principles of law; judicial decisions; juristic work on international law (the teachings of publicists); principles of equity and ex aequo et bono; General Assembly and Security Council resolutions and practices.

3. Soru

What does ex aequo et bono mean?

Cevap

Ex aequo et bono means what is just and fair or according to equity and good conscience. Something to be decided ex aequo et bono is something that is to be decided by principles of what is fair and just. A decision-maker who is authorized to decide ex aequo et bono is not bound by legal rules but may take account of what is just and fair.

Ex aequo et bono means what is just and fair or according to equity and good conscience. Something to be decided ex aequo et bono is something that is to be decided by principles of what is fair and just. A decision-maker who is authorized to decide ex aequo et bono is not bound by legal rules but may take account of what is just and fair.

Ex aequo et bono means what is just and fair or according to equity and good conscience. Something to be decided ex aequo et bono is something that is to be decided by principles of what is fair and just. A decision-maker who is authorized to decide ex aequo et bono is not bound by legal rules but may take account of what is just and fair.

Ex aequo et bono means what is just and fair or according to equity and good conscience. Something to be decided ex aequo et bono is something that is to be decided by principles of what is fair and just. A decision-maker who is authorized to decide ex aequo et bono is not bound by legal rules but may take account of what is just and fair.

Ex aequo et bono means what is just and fair or according to equity and good conscience. Something to be decided ex aequo et bono is something that is to be decided by principles of what is fair and just. A decision-maker who is authorized to decide ex aequo et bono is not bound by legal rules but may take account of what is just and fair.

4. Soru

What are the main sources of international law?

Cevap

Treaties, custom, and general principles of law are the main sources of international law.

Treaties, custom, and general principles of law are the main sources of international law.

Treaties, custom, and general principles of law are the main sources of international law.

Treaties, custom, and general principles of law are the main sources of international law.

Treaties, custom, and general principles of law are the main sources of international law.

5. Soru

What are the subsidiary sources of international law?

Cevap

Judicial decisions and juristic work on international law fall into the category ofsubsidiary sources.

Judicial decisions and juristic work on international law fall into the category ofsubsidiary sources.

Judicial decisions and juristic work on international law fall into the category ofsubsidiary sources.

Judicial decisions and juristic work on international law fall into the category ofsubsidiary sources.

Judicial decisions and juristic work on international law fall into the category ofsubsidiary sources.

6. Soru

What are the requirements for a custom to be accepted as law?

Cevap

There are two requirements for a custom to be accepted as law: (i) there should be sufficiently uniform general practice accepted as law, and (ii) the belief that such a practice is obligatory.

There are two requirements for a custom to be accepted as law: (i) there should be sufficiently uniform general practice accepted as law, and (ii) the belief that such a practice is obligatory.

There are two requirements for a custom to be accepted as law: (i) there should be sufficiently uniform general practice accepted as law, and (ii) the belief that such a practice is obligatory.

There are two requirements for a custom to be accepted as law: (i) there should be sufficiently uniform general practice accepted as law, and (ii) the belief that such a practice is obligatory.

There are two requirements for a custom to be accepted as law: (i) there should be sufficiently uniform general practice accepted as law, and (ii) the belief that such a practice is obligatory.

7. Soru

How is state practice categorized?

Cevap

State practice can be categorized into three groups as evidenced: (a) in the mutual relations among States, (b) in the practice of international organizations, and (c) the unilateral practices of States.

State practice can be categorized into three groups as evidenced: (a) in the mutual relations among States, (b) in the practice of international organizations, and (c) the unilateral practices of States.

State practice can be categorized into three groups as evidenced: (a) in the mutual relations among States, (b) in the practice of international organizations, and (c) the unilateral practices of States.

State practice can be categorized into three groups as evidenced: (a) in the mutual relations among States, (b) in the practice of international organizations, and (c) the unilateral practices of States.

State practice can be categorized into three groups as evidenced: (a) in the mutual relations among States, (b) in the practice of international organizations, and (c) the unilateral practices of States.

8. Soru

What are the main reasons for the decline in the importance of customary law?

Cevap

  • the fact that there are about 200 states and that crating a new custom is  slow process
  • the question of whether a usage has crystallized into a custom is riddled with many difficulties
  • the fact that customary law is an unsuitable vehicle to manage and respond to new scientific challenges
9. Soru

What are the factors that make a treaty general or particular?

Cevap

A convention (treaty) may be general either because of the number of parties (as being accepted by a large number of States), or because of the nature of its contents (which is of universal importance). It may be particular because of the limited number of parties, or because of the limited character of its subject-matter.

A convention (treaty) may be general either because of the number of parties (as being accepted by a large number of States), or because of the nature of its contents (which is of universal importance). It may be particular because of the limited number of parties, or because of the limited character of its subject-matter.

A convention (treaty) may be general either because of the number of parties (as being accepted by a large number of States), or because of the nature of its contents (which is of universal importance). It may be particular because of the limited number of parties, or because of the limited character of its subject-matter.

A convention (treaty) may be general either because of the number of parties (as being accepted by a large number of States), or because of the nature of its contents (which is of universal importance). It may be particular because of the limited number of parties, or because of the limited character of its subject-matter.

A convention (treaty) may be general either because of the number of parties (as being accepted by a large number of States), or because of the nature of its contents (which is of universal importance). It may be particular because of the limited number of parties, or because of the limited character of its subject-matter.

10. Soru

What is a treaty contract?

Cevap

A treaty contract is an agreement between two (or only limited number of ) States on a special matter concerning those States exclusively. Such treaties create obligations for the parties that would not have existed under the general international law or they modify the existing rules as applicable to their mutual relations.

A treaty contract is an agreement between two (or only limited number of ) States on a special matter concerning those States exclusively. Such treaties create obligations for the parties that would not have existed under the general international law or they modify the existing rules as applicable to their mutual relations.

A treaty contract is an agreement between two (or only limited number of ) States on a special matter concerning those States exclusively. Such treaties create obligations for the parties that would not have existed under the general international law or they modify the existing rules as applicable to their mutual relations.

A treaty contract is an agreement between two (or only limited number of ) States on a special matter concerning those States exclusively. Such treaties create obligations for the parties that would not have existed under the general international law or they modify the existing rules as applicable to their mutual relations.

A treaty contract is an agreement between two (or only limited number of ) States on a special matter concerning those States exclusively. Such treaties create obligations for the parties that would not have existed under the general international law or they modify the existing rules as applicable to their mutual relations.

11. Soru

What is a soft law?

Cevap

Guidelines of behavior such as those provided by treaties not yet in force, resolutions of the United Nations, or international conferences, that are not binding in themselves but are more than mere statements of political aspiration (they fall into a legal/political limbo between these two states).

Guidelines of behavior such as those provided by treaties not yet in force, resolutions of the United Nations, or international conferences, that are not binding in themselves but are more than mere statements of political aspiration (they fall into a legal/political limbo between these two states).

Guidelines of behavior such as those provided by treaties not yet in force, resolutions of the United Nations, or international conferences, that are not binding in themselves but are more than mere statements of political aspiration (they fall into a legal/political limbo between these two states).

Guidelines of behavior such as those provided by treaties not yet in force, resolutions of the United Nations, or international conferences, that are not binding in themselves but are more than mere statements of political aspiration (they fall into a legal/political limbo between these two states).

Guidelines of behavior such as those provided by treaties not yet in force, resolutions of the United Nations, or international conferences, that are not binding in themselves but are more than mere statements of political aspiration (they fall into a legal/political limbo between these two states).

12. Soru

What is a custom within the context of international law?

Cevap

Custom is a habitual course of conduct or general practice accepted as law. Custom evolves after a long historical process culminating in its recognition by the community.

Custom is a habitual course of conduct or general practice accepted as law. Custom evolves after a long historical process culminating in its recognition by the community.

Custom is a habitual course of conduct or general practice accepted as law. Custom evolves after a long historical process culminating in its recognition by the community.

Custom is a habitual course of conduct or general practice accepted as law. Custom evolves after a long historical process culminating in its recognition by the community.

Custom is a habitual course of conduct or general practice accepted as law. Custom evolves after a long historical process culminating in its recognition by the community.

13. Soru

When can a custom be treated as a source of law?

Cevap

Custom may be treated as a source of law if it manifests the attributes of antiquity, certainty, continuity, consistency, and uniformity.

Custom may be treated as a source of law if it manifests the attributes of antiquity, certainty, continuity, consistency, and uniformity.

Custom may be treated as a source of law if it manifests the attributes of antiquity, certainty, continuity, consistency, and uniformity.

Custom may be treated as a source of law if it manifests the attributes of antiquity, certainty, continuity, consistency, and uniformity.

Custom may be treated as a source of law if it manifests the attributes of antiquity, certainty, continuity, consistency, and uniformity.

14. Soru

How can we distinguish between the terms custom and usage?

Cevap

Usages are habits, often repeated but conflicting. They also vary from one State to another. On the other hand, custom is self-consistent and unified. Usage represents the twilight stage of custom. Custom begins where usage ends. However, it is not necessary that a usage should precede a custom or that a usage becomes a custom. Similarly, there is no international rule that determines when usage shall culminate into a custom.

Usages are habits, often repeated but conflicting. They also vary from one State to another. On the other hand, custom is self-consistent and unified. Usage represents the twilight stage of custom. Custom begins where usage ends. However, it is not necessary that a usage should precede a custom or that a usage becomes a custom. Similarly, there is no international rule that determines when usage shall culminate into a custom.

Usages are habits, often repeated but conflicting. They also vary from one State to another. On the other hand, custom is self-consistent and unified. Usage represents the twilight stage of custom. Custom begins where usage ends. However, it is not necessary that a usage should precede a custom or that a usage becomes a custom. Similarly, there is no international rule that determines when usage shall culminate into a custom.

Usages are habits, often repeated but conflicting. They also vary from one State to another. On the other hand, custom is self-consistent and unified. Usage represents the twilight stage of custom. Custom begins where usage ends. However, it is not necessary that a usage should precede a custom or that a usage becomes a custom. Similarly, there is no international rule that determines when usage shall culminate into a custom.

Usages are habits, often repeated but conflicting. They also vary from one State to another. On the other hand, custom is self-consistent and unified. Usage represents the twilight stage of custom. Custom begins where usage ends. However, it is not necessary that a usage should precede a custom or that a usage becomes a custom. Similarly, there is no international rule that determines when usage shall culminate into a custom.

15. Soru

What are the factors that make a practice or usage a customary rule of international law?

Cevap

For a practice or usage to become a customary rule of international law, the following two factors are essential:

  • A material fact: in similar circumstances States act similarly, in other words, usage has been constantly and uniformly practiced by States.
  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.

For a practice or usage to become a customary rule of international law, the following two factors are essential:

  • A material fact: in similar circumstances States act similarly, in other words, usage has been constantly and uniformly practiced by States.
  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.

For a practice or usage to become a customary rule of international law, the following two factors are essential:

  • A material fact: in similar circumstances States act similarly, in other words, usage has been constantly and uniformly practiced by States.
  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.

For a practice or usage to become a customary rule of international law, the following two factors are essential:

  • A material fact: in similar circumstances States act similarly, in other words, usage has been constantly and uniformly practiced by States.
  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.

For a practice or usage to become a customary rule of international law, the following two factors are essential:

  • A material fact: in similar circumstances States act similarly, in other words, usage has been constantly and uniformly practiced by States.
  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.

  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.

  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.

  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.

  • A psychological element: (opinio juris sive necessitatis) (an opinion of law or necessity)- the feeling on the part of States that in acting as they act they are fulfilling a legal obligation.
16. Soru

What does state practice include?

Cevap

State practice may include treaties, diplomatic correspondence and relations, opinions of national legal advisers, national legislation, policy statements, press releases, official manuals on legal questions, executive decisions and practices, decisions of international and national courts, and the practices of international organizations.

State practice may include treaties, diplomatic correspondence and relations, opinions of national legal advisers, national legislation, policy statements, press releases, official manuals on legal questions, executive decisions and practices, decisions of international and national courts, and the practices of international organizations.

State practice may include treaties, diplomatic correspondence and relations, opinions of national legal advisers, national legislation, policy statements, press releases, official manuals on legal questions, executive decisions and practices, decisions of international and national courts, and the practices of international organizations.

State practice may include treaties, diplomatic correspondence and relations, opinions of national legal advisers, national legislation, policy statements, press releases, official manuals on legal questions, executive decisions and practices, decisions of international and national courts, and the practices of international organizations.

State practice may include treaties, diplomatic correspondence and relations, opinions of national legal advisers, national legislation, policy statements, press releases, official manuals on legal questions, executive decisions and practices, decisions of international and national courts, and the practices of international organizations.

17. Soru

Why is the importance of treaties said to be self-evident?

Cevap

The importance of treaties is self-evident, because under Article 38(l)(a) of the Statute of the ICJ ‘conventions’ have been mentioned as the first recourse which the Court is directed to resort for settling a dispute between the parties.

The importance of treaties is self-evident, because under Article 38(l)(a) of the Statute of the ICJ ‘conventions’ have been mentioned as the first recourse which the Court is directed to resort for settling a dispute between the parties.

The importance of treaties is self-evident, because under Article 38(l)(a) of the Statute of the ICJ ‘conventions’ have been mentioned as the first recourse which the Court is directed to resort for settling a dispute between the parties.

The importance of treaties is self-evident, because under Article 38(l)(a) of the Statute of the ICJ ‘conventions’ have been mentioned as the first recourse which the Court is directed to resort for settling a dispute between the parties.

The importance of treaties is self-evident, because under Article 38(l)(a) of the Statute of the ICJ ‘conventions’ have been mentioned as the first recourse which the Court is directed to resort for settling a dispute between the parties.

18. Soru

What is meant by Opinio Jurris Sive Necessitatis?

Cevap

The State practice, even though general and consistent, is not customary law unless an opinio juris or “psychological element” is present, i.e., the practice is recognized as obligatory and there is the conviction that its repetition is the result of a compulsory rule.

The State practice, even though general and consistent, is not customary law unless an opinio juris or “psychological element” is present, i.e., the practice is recognized as obligatory and there is the conviction that its repetition is the result of a compulsory rule.

The State practice, even though general and consistent, is not customary law unless an opinio juris or “psychological element” is present, i.e., the practice is recognized as obligatory and there is the conviction that its repetition is the result of a compulsory rule.

The State practice, even though general and consistent, is not customary law unless an opinio juris or “psychological element” is present, i.e., the practice is recognized as obligatory and there is the conviction that its repetition is the result of a compulsory rule.

The State practice, even though general and consistent, is not customary law unless an opinio juris or “psychological element” is present, i.e., the practice is recognized as obligatory and there is the conviction that its repetition is the result of a compulsory rule.

19. Soru

When does a treaty bind the non-parties?

Cevap

A treaty will bind the non-parties if they (expressly or by their conduct) manifest their intention to be bound by the provisions of the treaty as general rules of international law.

A treaty will bind the non-parties if they (expressly or by their conduct) manifest their intention to be bound by the provisions of the treaty as general rules of international law.

A treaty will bind the non-parties if they (expressly or by their conduct) manifest their intention to be bound by the provisions of the treaty as general rules of international law.

A treaty will bind the non-parties if they (expressly or by their conduct) manifest their intention to be bound by the provisions of the treaty as general rules of international law.

A treaty will bind the non-parties if they (expressly or by their conduct) manifest their intention to be bound by the provisions of the treaty as general rules of international law.

20. Soru

What is meant by non-liquet in international law?

Cevap

Non-liquet means “it is not clear.” In law, a non liquet is a situation where there is no applicable law. It refers to a situation in which a competent court or tribunal fails to decide the merits of a case for the absence of suitable law, the vagueness or ambiguity of rules, inconsistencies in law, or the injustice of the legal consequences.

Non-liquet means “it is not clear.” In law, a non liquet is a situation where there is no applicable law. It refers to a situation in which a competent court or tribunal fails to decide the merits of a case for the absence of suitable law, the vagueness or ambiguity of rules, inconsistencies in law, or the injustice of the legal consequences.

Non-liquet means “it is not clear.” In law, a non liquet is a situation where there is no applicable law. It refers to a situation in which a competent court or tribunal fails to decide the merits of a case for the absence of suitable law, the vagueness or ambiguity of rules, inconsistencies in law, or the injustice of the legal consequences.

Non-liquet means “it is not clear.” In law, a non liquet is a situation where there is no applicable law. It refers to a situation in which a competent court or tribunal fails to decide the merits of a case for the absence of suitable law, the vagueness or ambiguity of rules, inconsistencies in law, or the injustice of the legal consequences.

Non-liquet means “it is not clear.” In law, a non liquet is a situation where there is no applicable law. It refers to a situation in which a competent court or tribunal fails to decide the merits of a case for the absence of suitable law, the vagueness or ambiguity of rules, inconsistencies in law, or the injustice of the legal consequences.

İlgili Makaleler

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak.